MP Iaroslav Zhelezniak has been pivotal in discussing key issues within the Ukrainian government. Recently, he highlighted concerns over a new minerals agreement with the United States, emphasizing the lack of security guarantees. Furthermore, he shed light on the Ministry of Defence's UAH 78 billion allocation to Polish firm PHU Lechmar for ammunition, pinpointing inefficiencies and overdue deliveries. Zhelezniak also criticized the government's spending on media, as significant funds from state budgets are funneled into new media projects. In addition, he addressed the transparency in diplomatic appointments and the implications of the Verkhovna Rada's legislative decisions on Ukraine's socio-political landscape. These topics underscore his active role in political discourse and oversight.
What are the main concerns Zhelezniak raised about the US minerals agreement?
MP Iaroslav Zhelezniak expressed concerns that the new agreement draft with the United States on minerals lacks explicit security guarantees for Ukraine. These guarantees are crucial for ensuring Ukraine's economic stability and defense readiness, as minerals can be strategically vital. Zhelezniak's critique highlights a need for careful scrutiny of international agreements to protect national interests.
Why is Zhelezniak critical of the Ministry of Defence's allocation of funds to PHU Lechmar?
Zhelezniak criticizes the Ministry of Defence for allocating UAH 78 billion to Polish company PHU Lechmar, citing significant receivables and delays. He emphasizes that such inefficiencies in procurement could undermine Ukraine's military readiness. The criticism suggests a call for more stringent oversight and accountability in defense-related expenditures.
What did Zhelezniak say about the government's spending on new media?
Zhelezniak pointed out that large amounts of state funds have been directed towards creating new media outlets. He raises concerns about the transparency and intentions behind these investments, suggesting that the rapid rise of these media empires might be politically motivated. His comments stress the need for fiscal responsibility and impartiality in the media.
How does Zhelezniak view the role of diplomatic posts in Ukraine?
Zhelezniak suggests that diplomatic appointments have become a form of political currency within Ukraine. He warns that such positions are often used as leverage by those in power, potentially compromising the integrity and effectiveness of Ukraine's diplomatic efforts. This view calls for a more merit-based diplomatic corps to represent Ukraine.
What legislative issues did Zhelezniak highlight regarding the Verkhovna Rada?
Zhelezniak highlighted several legislative challenges, including the delay in excise tax laws on cigarettes, leading to significant fiscal losses. He also emphasized the importance of timely decision-making in military procurement and criticized the lack of progress in legislative reforms. His observations underline the need for efficient legislative processes to ensure national economic and defense security.
