President desecrated memory of Maidan
Volodymyr Zelenskyy should immediately apologize to foreign media for shamefully insulting the Maidan revolution.
It is a great shame that the President of Ukraine has desecrated the memory of Maidan.
Firstly, neither the first nor the second Maidan were some kind of Russian technology, because it was a popular protest against the pro-Russian regime of Yanukovych. Therefore, the third Maidan cannot be called a Russian technology.
Secondly, this false statement was voiced by Zelenskyy, as always, from the hands of those who write him texts. And pro-Russian leaders in his entourage write - the head of the president's office, Andrii Yermak, at one time an assistant to a deputy of the Party of Regions, who contributed to Putin's invasion with his capitulation policy, and the deputy head of the president's office, Oleh Tatarov, who was one of the heads of the Ministry of Internal Affairs during the Yanukovych era and publicly opposed the Maidan.
Thirdly, according to the testimony of Russian FSB agent Oleg Kulinich in court, Zelenskyy himself came to power thanks to the participation of FSB agent Volodymyr Sivkovych, who was exposed by the SSU (Security Service of Ukraine) and the SBI (State Bureau of Investigation), in his election campaign. It was Zelenskyy who appointed Kulinich as head of the SSU in Crimea, and thus opened the way for the Russian invasion. And Zelenskyy's sponsor and employer, Ihor Kolomoiskyi, is currently in custody on several corruption cases. So who's project is there - questions can only be directed to Zelenskyy himself, not to Maidan.
Fourthly. The people of Ukraine have the right to protest under the Constitution. And the president should respect that right, not try to desecrate it. It is the people who are fighting the war despite the intentional disruption of all defense plans that Zelenskyy and his government failed before the invasion. It is Zelenskyy who is responsible for the shameful surrender of southern Ukraine in a few days. And the people have the right to protest against a president who turned out to be incapable of preparing the country for war, reforming the defense forces and building a strategy for victory. All of Zelenskyy's power is held not because he is respected by the majority of society, but because hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians have voluntarily gone to the front and are fighting to the last. And the will of these people is much more important for Ukraine than Zelenskyy's latest false statements about the Maidan.
There was accurate information about Zelenskyy, his stay and security measures in Russia, since the exposed FSB agents Kulinich and Naumov were in senior positions in the SSU, and the Russian agent Demchenko was the head of the intelligence committee. There are still many people with pro-Russian biographies in the president's entourage. Putin could have started the war by striking the Ukrainian government, but he did not do it to persuade Zelenskyy and his entourage to make the decisions the Russians needed.
All the stories about mythical saboteurs who wanted to go to Bankova Street are not confirmed by facts, all this turned out to be fakes. There were no missile strikes either.
In fact, Zelenskyy is a clear candidate for Putin, with whom he has established stable contacts, direct ties with Yermak and Demchenko are maintained, and everything is clear. Both assistants of FSB agent Sivkovych are now Servants of the People.
Therefore, on the contrary, the Maidan as an anti-Russian protest contains unknown factors for Putin - after the Maidan or after the elections, Zelenskyy will be replaced by some unknown, new, but definitely much more independent and anti-Russian government and this is definitely disadvantageous to Putin.
Yurii Butusov, Censor.NET
