9238 visitors online
Judicial reform in Ukraine continues to be a central focus for the EU and international bodies. Recent developments include the EU's call for continued reform efforts, highlighting the judiciary's vital role in ensuring justice and fighting corruption. The Supreme Court's recent decision potentially affecting the reform's integrity and the delay in implementing key recommendations have raised concerns among reform advocates. Despite setbacks, efforts to reinstate the Supreme Council of Justice and establish an effective anti-corruption court remain crucial. Maintaining momentum in these judicial reforms is essential for Ukraine's EU integration and adherence to international standards.

What are the main objectives of judicial reform in Ukraine?

The main objectives include enhancing the independence, accountability, and efficiency of the judiciary. This involves reforming the selection process of judges, curbing corruption, and establishing transparent judicial systems to restore public trust and meet EU standards.

How does the European Union view Ukraine's judicial reform progress?

The European Union closely monitors Ukraine's judicial reform, emphasizing its significance for EU integration and cooperation. The EU insists on more tangible progress, especially in ensuring an independent judiciary and addressing corruption effectively through robust legal frameworks.

What challenges does Ukraine face in implementing judicial reform?

Ukraine faces challenges such as political resistance, entrenched interests within the judicial system, and the slow pace of legislative changes. Additionally, the retention of dishonest judges and decisions undermining reform efforts are significant hurdles that need addressing.

How does the recent Supreme Court decision affect judicial reform?

The recent Supreme Court decision, which allows many judges previously deemed dishonest to remain, presents a setback for judicial reform. It jeopardizes efforts to cleanse the judiciary and could delay implementing comprehensive changes essential for enhancing judicial integrity and accountability.

What role does the anti-corruption court play in Ukraine's judicial reform?

The anti-corruption court is pivotal in Ukraine's judicial reform as it aims to handle high-profile corruption cases impartially and efficiently. Its successful establishment is crucial for boosting public confidence and demonstrating Ukraine's commitment to eliminating corruption at all levels.

Why is the EU interested in Ukraine's judicial reform?

The EU is keenly interested in Ukraine's judicial reform because it influences bilateral relations and Ukraine's path towards EU membership. A reformed and independent judiciary is vital for implementing democratic principles, enhancing the rule of law, and building a corruption-free state necessary for closer EU ties.

What has been announced regarding the reform of the Supreme Council of Justice?

The reform of the Supreme Council of Justice is regarded as crucial for maintaining judicial independence and accountability. International bodies and ambassadors have urged Ukraine to expedite this reform, which is vital for ensuring fair judicial proceedings and rebuilding trust in the judiciary system.

show details

Articles judicial reform

Andrii, Haichenko Deputy Justice Minister Andrii Haichenko: "Previously, expert was essentially slave to their supervisor. We have prevented abuses of power by heads of forensic institutions" Since the onset of the full-scale war, the number of requests for forensic examinations has multiplied. Among the most in-demand are explosive, environmental, construction and engineering, and military forensics. However, despite the critical role this institution plays in the justice system, it has remained underfunded and vulnerable to outside influence for years. 5 449 4 Previously in trend: Judicial reform

Zhernakov DEJURE Foundation Executive Director Mykhailo Zhernakov: "If things continue at this pace, just like now, and we are "hurtling" toward wall, then we’ll hurtle into it very quickly" Why could the new bills on judicial reforms potentially worsen the progress already made in the development of courts and their independence? Why are citizens required to pay fees for complaints against judges, and under what conditions might they be unable to file such complaints? What role do international experts play in the selection commissions for appointing judges, and how does this affect the judicial system as a whole? 17 975 12

Tsarevych Saving Tsarevych and KDAC: How SBI case could change fate of notorious judges It is unclear how searches involving 20 people in the early morning could change the essence of the case in which Tandyr fatally hit a man. However, this proceeding could ultimately allow a number of notorious judges to retain their positions. 14 531 27 Previously in trend: Judicial reform

хупер Deputy Chairman of the Board of Ethics Anthony Hooper: "We had a candidate who connected from front. And during interview he received an alert about threat of artillery fire." After the Ethics Council, an independent body that is supposed to evaluate the integrity of candidates for the positions of members of the High Council of Justice, decided to close the interviews with the candidates and conduct them without online broadcasting, citing the effect of martial law, the public had many questions about the transparency of the process evaluation in general. 11 380 2

Fighting corruption, Ukraine starts to judge its judges Fighting corruption, Ukraine starts to judge its judges "We feel the resistance of the old, unreformed system." 188 0 Previously in trend: Fighting corruption in Ukraine