European Solidarity, also known as Ievropeyska Solidarnist, is strongly advocating for the independence of NABU and SAPO, crucial institutions in Ukraine's anti-corruption framework. Recently, the party submitted an alternative bill to the Verkhovna Rada, challenging the presidential proposal, emphasizing the need for the procedural autonomy of these bodies. On July 12, the faction openly defended Vitalii Shabunin, an anti-corruption activist under suspicion, highlighting concerns over political persecution. The party has also actively engaged in legislative amendments related to defense financing and budget proposals to ensure resources are allocated efficiently for the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU). These efforts indicate their strategic focus on maintaining transparency and accountability amidst ongoing socio-political challenges.
What steps has European Solidarity taken to support NABU and SAPO independence?
European Solidarity submitted an alternative bill to the Verkhovna Rada to ensure the independence of NABU and SAPO. This move is a direct response to the presidential bill, aiming to safeguard these institutions' procedural autonomy in handling anti-corruption cases, which is crucial for effective transparency and governance in Ukraine.
How has European Solidarity reacted to the political pressure on activists like Shabunin?
European Solidarity, along with Holos and Transparency International, has publicly defended Vitalii Shabunin, highlighting the political pressure and persecution he faces. The party emphasizes the importance of protecting activists who criticize the authorities, as their role is vital for maintaining democratic practices and anti-corruption transparency in Ukraine.
What is European Solidarity's stance on funding Ukraine's defense efforts?
European Solidarity has proposed legislative amendments to redirect the military tax and revenues from domestic bonds to a trust fund, thereby securing financial resources for the Armed Forces. This initiative reflects their commitment to efficient resource allocation for defense, ensuring sustainable support for military operations without increasing existing taxes.
What actions has European Solidarity taken against potential government overreach?
The party has actively participated in parliamentary procedures, such as blocking the Verkhovna Rada's rostrum, demanding clarity on the use of sanctions against former president Petro Poroshenko. European Solidarity has consistently advocated against what it perceives as dictatorial moves, emphasizing the need for parliamentary accountability and transparency in governance.
What economic proposals has European Solidarity made to address Ukraine's budgetary needs?
European Solidarity, under Petro Poroshenko's leadership, presented substantial proposals to the 2025 state budget. They advocate cutting untargeted spending while utilizing military tax funds exclusively for army needs. By shifting resources appropriately, the party aims to address Ukraine's financial challenges without imposing additional tax burdens on citizens.
How does European Solidarity plan to support anti-corruption reforms in Ukraine?
The party emphasizes the independence of key anti-corruption bodies like NABU and SAPO, supporting alternative legislative measures to preserve their autonomy. Additionally, it stands firm against potential political persecutions of activists, aligning with international organizations and local NGOs to maintain the momentum toward effective anti-corruption measures in Ukraine.
What are the implications of European Solidarity's actions on Ukraine's political landscape?
By advocating for structural independence of anti-corruption bodies and defending political activists, European Solidarity positions itself as a key proponent of democratic values and governance stability. Its actions contribute to a more accountable political landscape, fostering transparency and combating corruption effectively.
