12663 visitors online
1 842 16

AntAC wins Supreme Court case against Portnov: claim about pro-Russian activities does not require refutation

Supreme Court rules in ACCC case against Portnov

The Anti-Corruption Action Center (AntAC) has won its case against Russian agent Portnov in the Supreme Court. The court confirmed that the claim that he was linked to pro-Russian activities does not require refutation.

Censor.NET reports this.

Details

"The Cassation Civil Court within the Supreme Court overturned the ruling of Kyiv’s Pecherskyi District Court, issued by Judge Serhii Vovk, as well as the appellate ruling in Andrii Portnov’s case against the Anti-Corruption Action Center.

Back in 2023, Portnov sued the Anti-Corruption Action Center, demanding that the court recognize that he was not a pro-Russian figure and prohibit calling him a collaborator, a traitor, or an accomplice of the Russian Federation," the statement says.

The lawsuit concerned a column by the Anti-Corruption Action Center and Avtomaidan in which Portnov was mentioned among individuals against whom the state could impose sanctions over their pro-Russian activities.

"Judge Vovk granted that claim. This ruling was an example of how courts are used to pressure civil society organizations and the media, forcing them to abandon critical assessments and restricting freedom of speech on matters of public interest.

And now the Supreme Court has overturned the rulings of the Pecherskyi court and the appellate court. Importantly, Judge Vovk’s ruling was overturned precisely because it was unlawful, not because of Portnov’s death.

If the Supreme Court had considered the ruling lawful, it would have left it in force despite the plaintiff’s death. Instead, the court directly removed that ruling from the legal field. Portnov is no longer alive, but that did not prevent us from winning the case against him," they concluded.

Portnov’s lawsuits

It was reported in 2023 that Portnov had sued the Anti-Corruption Action Center over a publication that described him as a pro-Russian politician.

Portnov also sued journalists and the editor-in-chief of Censor.NET over the description of him as a "collaborator and traitor."

It is known that Portnov demanded that the Cabinet of Ministers remove a petition calling for sanctions to be imposed on him.

Murder of Andrii Portnov

Supreme Court rules in ACCC case against Portnov